The EB2 National Interest Waiver rule and the NYSDOT case require an immigrant applicant to demonstrate outstanding abilities and substantial contributions in order to decide whether or not they stand out in their profession. The EB2 National Interest Waiver petition must have strong supporting documentation to satisfy these requirements, such as: Past Accomplishments: The evidence should emphasize the applicant's track record of noteworthy accomplishments and contributions to the field, highlighting their pivotal position in notable undertakings. These contributions need to be observable and suggestive of prior accomplishments. Particular Job Description: An extensive job description might bolster the argument, particularly if the role calls for extraordinary aptitude and excellent qualifications, even though a job offer made in the United States is not required for the EB2 National Interest Waiver petition. Evidence may also highlight the candidate's work-related activities and their significant contribution to initiatives advancing the interests of the US national interest. Recommendation Letters: In order to prove an applicant's eligibility for the EB2 National Interest Waiver petition, reference or recommendation letters from subject-matter experts are required. These letters must to be detailed, highlight the advantages of the applicant's actions, and stress how important their job is. Get Letters of Recommendation or Reference for Your Petition for EB2 National Interest Waiver Good reference or recommendation letters are essential to the success of an EB2 National Interest Waiver application. A foreign beneficiary must get strong recommendation letters from peers in both their outer circle and inner circle The inner circle consists of those with whom the recipient has had direct professional or academic collaboration. Despite the fact that these letters are often full of praise, their possible bias makes them subject to question. The following criteria should be followed when choosing who to ask for reference letters from: Expert or Authority Letters Are More Credible: People who are recognized as authorities or experts in the subject are usually considered to be more credible. It is best to add a sentence in the letter of support outlining these people's credentials to evaluate the beneficiary's work. Letters from Identifiably Unrelated or Closely Associated Individuals May Be Given Little or No Weight: Letters of support from individuals who are closely associated with the recipient or from coworkers in the same organization may be given little or no weight. This is due to the common perception that these letters lack objectivity. Testimonials from unremarkable coworkers or previous teachers could also be scrutinized more closely than those from senior managers of reputable companies. Suggestions from an unbiased third party are highly appreciated: For USCIS, objectivity is an essential factor. Due to possible prejudice, letters from coworkers in the beneficiary's organization could be disregarded. However, they could be great candidates for recommendation letters if a professor or employer has substantial information of the beneficiary's accomplishments and can provide a solid reference.